Cloning copies an output. Training shapes a collaborator. The difference sounds academic until you read two drafts side by side — one that mimics your sentences, and one that actually thinks in your register — and realize only the second one is usable.
We train on an author's own corpus, with their consent, to build an assistant that proposes in their direction rather than averaging toward the middle. It learns your habits of emphasis, your tolerance for the long sentence, the words you reach for and the ones you never would. Then it makes suggestions you are free to reject.
The red lines
We do not train on work the author doesn't own. We do not replicate a living writer's voice for someone else. And we never let the assistant ship a sentence the author hasn't seen and approved. The technology can do more than this. We choose not to.